I play online
poker for play money. Before it was
outlawed I played for real money. Never
much – a few hundreds of dollars. I
lost. When real money got outlawed I
expected that the quality of the games with play money would diminish – but
that didn’t happen. There were
sufficient number of people who played and wanted to win that the games
maintained an interest for me.
One, through
their successes, builds up a “bank account” of play money so you can play in games
with an increasing “buy-in.” At the
lowest level the games resembles bingo – purely random. But with a bit of rationality and skill you
can win more than your share and get into better games (i.e., higher buy-ins)
where inherent skill plays a bigger role.
Poker is a game
of randomness and the best you can hope for is that by playing the odds, in the
long run, you’ll win. Not every pot,
not every tournament, but more than your share. I started with about 1000 chips – given gratis when you start - and now
have over 15 million. It’s taken me a
couple of years to do that. One has bad
luck – and good luck. There are unbelievable
ways to win and to lose.
“Psychology
Today” has a nice article ( http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cui-bono/201103/life-poker
) about how poker is a metaphor for
life. Some of us are dealt strong hands
at birth and some of us aren’t so lucky.
As humans – not in a casino - do we care for those who were dealt a bad
hand at birth?
I also play
online chess. In chess there is no
luck. Complete knowledge is visible. The two games – chess and poker – are completely
opposites in how you approach them. In
poker – as in baseball – if you hit .300 you’re probably an all-star. In chess you’re a dismal failure.
I find that in
periods when I’m doing well in poker I do poorly in chess and vice-versa. In poker you have to go with your instincts
more. “Is this a good time to bluff?” If one never bluffs in poker, one
loses. It’s impossible to bluff in chess.
Why can’t one
rely on both instincts and rationality at the same time?
2014 Lester C.
Welch
No comments:
Post a Comment