I have a real prejudice against
"financial advisors." 1) If they're so smart, why are they still
working and not lounging on the beach in the Carribbean ? 2) Their
recommendations generally will not be proven/disproven for decades - by which
time they are no longer available and not accountable. Take 40 hours and learn
the basics and make your own mistakes - and thereby learn. Don't expect
others to make you rich if they can't do it for themselves.
© 2015 Lester C. Welch
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
"I understand the Second Amendment. I respect the Second Amendment. I think we need to use common sense tools to keep the American people safe, to keep our streets safe." Eric Holder
The First Amendment to
the US Bill of Rights guarantees freedom of speech - and we exercise it.
However it has limits. You can't libel someone, you can't yell "fire"
in a theatre. We respect those limits because they protect the innocent. Exactly
where the limits are is an interpretation of the courts. Reasonable people
accept that legal process. The Second Amendment guarantees the public the right
to bear arms. It also has limits. One can't own a bazooka, or a side-winder missile. Where those limits are, should also be a
rendering of the court. However whenever a reasonable person suggests an
examination of those limits ( who can own an AK-15 or the size of a ammunition
magazine clip) they are characterized as trying to get rid of the Second
Amendment entirely. Such hyperbole by the opposition of such an examination
undermines their credibility and shows the weakness of their position. No one
is wanting to eliminate the Second Amendment - only to reach a limit where
fewer innocent people get killed.
© 2015 Lester C. Welch
Sunday, January 4, 2015
"Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude." ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
If you're prone to be generous, compassionate and caring are you more likely to assume that others have the same characteristics? If you're lazy, looking for an easy way out, and a way to make a quick buck, are you likely to ascribe those attributes to others?
Why do some people see government officials as corrupt, inefficient, and lazy? Is it because they, themselves, would behave in that manner if they were in that position?
Why do others see those in power as acting only in the public good by wanting to eliminate poverty, hunger, and providing medical care for those in need? Is it because they, themselves, would behave in that manner if they were in that position?
Is this the source of the progressive/conservative split in ideologies? Perhaps both ways of thinking served a purpose in our evolution and each deserve credit for contributing to our continued existence and now we must bear the consequences of the dichotomy.
How much do you attribute to others your own personal attributes?
© 2015 Lester C. Welch
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)